05 · 2025
Circular Clock Radio
From analysis to circular design: a clock radio that is repairable and sustainable.

Role
Group project, analysis and design improvement
Year
April 2025 — June 2025
Tools
SolidWorks · Material research · Design guidelines
Context
Design engineering period 4, technical and sustainability aspects of consumer products.
The assignment
The assignment was to analyze and redesign an existing product (a clock radio) from a circular design perspective.
The challenge was to improve the product's sustainability by focusing on:
- Repairability
- Modularity
- Material use and environmental impact
The design also had to be supported by various analysis methods and translated into concrete design improvements.
The result
The result is a substantiated redesign of a clock radio, significantly improving the product's circularity. My focus was on:
- Analyzing the product and identifying repairability issues
- Developing a design proposal with better accessibility and replaceability of parts
- Supporting material choices with a performance index
Material choice well researched and argumentation is well described. You made the translation to what this means for the product by applying design guidelines in your design.
The design resulted in
A clock radio where key parts are easy to remove An improvement in repairability score from 3.5 to 7.5 A material choice (PLA) that reduces CO₂ emissions A visually developed concept with models and posters
Approach & my role
This project was carried out in a group of three, each member developing their own design direction within the theme of circularity. My role:
- Conducting product analyses and identifying repairability issues
- Choosing and developing an innovation opportunity focused on repairability
- Supporting design choices with methods such as the performance index
- Developing the design in sketches and digital models
- Creating a visual poster presentation of my concept
My approach
Analyzing the current clock radio (structure, materials, use) Identifying problems with hard-to-replace parts Developing a design where parts can be removed without tools Applying material analysis for more sustainable choices Iterating based on feedback and improving the design My focus was on translating analysis into concrete, feasible design improvements.
A strong answer to the brief
This project is a strong answer to the brief because:
- The design demonstrably improves the product's repairability
- Circularity is considered through material and design choices
- The product is easier to disassemble and repair
- All design choices are supported by analyses and methods
- Able to conduct product analyses and translate them into design improvements
- Understanding of circular design and sustainability
- Able to support technical and material choices
- Able to independently develop a design part within a group project
- Able to reflect on my own process and collaboration




